1994 Catalina 320 vs 1978 Cape Dory 270 — Comparison

1994 Catalina 3201994 Catalina 320
VS
1978 Cape Dory 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 Catalina 3201978 Cape Dory 270
General
ManufacturerCatalinaCape Dory
Year1994–20071978–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasCarl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)6.40 m (21.0 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)2.59 m (8.5 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Ballast1,905 kg (4,200 lbs)1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.4 m² (510 ft²)28.0 m² (301 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity133 L (35.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Catalina 320
17.01
1978 Cape Dory 270
14.60
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Catalina 320
40.00
1978 Cape Dory 270
41.66
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Catalina 320
0.80
1978 Cape Dory 270
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Catalina 320
18.48
1978 Cape Dory 270
24.39

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Catalina 320 and 1978 Cape Dory 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Catalina 320 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1978 Cape Dory 270 is a 1970s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 1994 Catalina 320 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 1994 Catalina 320 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1978 Cape Dory 270 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.59m beam. The 1994 Catalina 320 is 1.52m longer than the 1978 Cape Dory 270. The 1994 Catalina 320 displaces approximately 75% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Catalina 320 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.01 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The 1978 Cape Dory 270, with an SA/D of 14.60 and 28.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1994 Catalina 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Catalina 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1978 Cape Dory 270 has a comfort ratio of 24.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1994 Catalina 320 and 41.7% for the 1978 Cape Dory 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Catalina 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 133L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Cape Dory 270 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Catalina 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1994 Catalina 320 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 Catalina 320 · 1978 Cape Dory 270