1994 Catalina 320 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison
1994 Catalina 320
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1994 Catalina 320 | 2003 Sabre 402 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Catalina | Sabre |
| Year | 1994–2007 | 2003–2010 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Gerry Douglas | Jim Taylor |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) | 12.19 m (40.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) | 3.72 m (12.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) | 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,905 kg (4,200 lbs) | 3,266 kg (7,200 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 47.4 m² (510 ft²) | 66.0 m² (710 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 151 L (39.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 133 L (35.1 gal) | 227 L (60.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1994 Catalina 320 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Catalina 320 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1994 Catalina 320 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.
In terms of size, the 1994 Catalina 320 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 2.44m longer than the 1994 Catalina 320. The 2003 Sabre 402 displaces approximately 71% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1994 Catalina 320 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.01 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 Catalina 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1994 Catalina 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1994 Catalina 320 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1994 Catalina 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 133L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1994 Catalina 320 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1994 Catalina 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2003 Sabre 402 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1994 Catalina 320 · 2003 Sabre 402