1994 Hylas 42 vs Hunter 33 — Comparison

1994 Hylas 42
VS
Hunter 33Hunter 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 Hylas 42Hunter 33
General
ManufacturerHylasHunter
Year1994–20041988–1994
TypeSloopSloop
CountryTaiwanUSA
DesignerGerman FrersHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.52 m (34.5 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area74.3 m² (800 ft²)48.0 m² (517 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity379 L (100.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Hylas 42
16.80
Hunter 33
17.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Hylas 42
40.48
Hunter 33
38.09
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Hylas 42
0.73
Hunter 33
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Hylas 42
19.29
Hunter 33
18.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Hylas 42 and Hunter 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Hylas 42 is a 1990s design by Hylas from Taiwan, while the Hunter 33 is a 1980s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1994 Hylas 42 was penned by German Frers. The Hunter 33 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1994 Hylas 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the Hunter 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1994 Hylas 42 is 2.74m longer than the Hunter 33. The 1994 Hylas 42 displaces approximately 100% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Hylas 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.80 and 74.3 m² of sail area. The Hunter 33, with an SA/D of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Hylas 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The Hunter 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1994 Hylas 42 and 38.1% for the Hunter 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Hylas 42 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 379L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The Hunter 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Hylas 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1994 Hylas 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 Hylas 42 · Hunter 33