1994 Hylas 42 vs Hanse 342 — Comparison

1994 Hylas 42
VS
Hanse 342Hanse 342

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 Hylas 42Hanse 342
General
ManufacturerHylasHanse
Year1994–20042006–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryTaiwanGermany
DesignerGerman Frersjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)10.30 m (33.8 ft)
LWL10.52 m (34.5 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area74.3 m² (800 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity379 L (100.1 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Hylas 42
16.80
Hanse 342
17.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Hylas 42
40.48
Hanse 342
31.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Hylas 42
0.73
Hanse 342
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Hylas 42
19.29
Hanse 342
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Hylas 42 and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Hylas 42 is a 1990s design by Hylas from Taiwan, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1994 Hylas 42 was penned by German Frers. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1994 Hylas 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1994 Hylas 42 is 2.50m longer than the Hanse 342. The 1994 Hylas 42 displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Hylas 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.80 and 74.3 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Hylas 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1994 Hylas 42 and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Hylas 42 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 379L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Hylas 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1994 Hylas 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 Hylas 42 · Hanse 342