2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 vs Hanse 342 — Comparison

2000 Beneteau Oceanis 4112000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
VS
Hanse 342Hanse 342

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411Hanse 342
General
ManufacturerBeneteauHanse
Year2000–20052006–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceGermany
DesignerGroupe Finotjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA12.22 m (40.1 ft)10.30 m (33.8 ft)
LWL10.52 m (34.5 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam3.90 m (12.8 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)
Ballast2,800 kg (6,173 lbs)1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area69.0 m² (743 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity130 L (34.3 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
17.24
Hanse 342
17.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
34.15
Hanse 342
31.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
0.77
Hanse 342
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
16.90
Hanse 342
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 is a 2000s design by Beneteau from France, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 was penned by Groupe Finot. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 measures 12.22m (40.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.90m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 is 1.92m longer than the Hanse 342. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 displaces approximately 55% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.24 and 69.0 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 34.2% for the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 342 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 · Hanse 342