1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 vs Hunter 260 — Comparison

1995 Beneteau Oceanis 3211995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
VS
Hunter 260Hunter 260

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321Hunter 260
General
ManufacturerBeneteauHunter
Year1995–20011998–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerGroupe FinotGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA9.68 m (31.8 ft)7.85 m (25.8 ft)
LWL8.45 m (27.7 ft)6.86 m (22.5 ft)
Beam3.27 m (10.7 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Ballast1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)771 kg (1,700 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)27.5 m² (296 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.37
Hunter 260
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
35.71
Hunter 260
37.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
0.81
Hunter 260
0.87
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.12
Hunter 260
15.99

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and Hunter 260 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the Hunter 260 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 was penned by Groupe Finot. The Hunter 260 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 measures 9.68m (31.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.27m, compared to the Hunter 260 at 7.85m (25.8ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 is 1.83m longer than the Hunter 260. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 displaces approximately 106% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.37 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 260, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 27.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 260 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The Hunter 260 has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.87. The ballast ratios are 35.7% for the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and 37.8% for the Hunter 260, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hunter 260 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 260 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 · Hunter 260