1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 vs 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 — Comparison

1995 Beneteau Oceanis 3211995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
VS
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 402010 Hallberg-Rassy 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 Beneteau Oceanis 3212010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
General
ManufacturerBeneteauHallberg-Rassy
Year1995–20012010–2017
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceSweden
DesignerGroupe FinotGerman Frers
Dimensions
LOA9.68 m (31.8 ft)12.08 m (39.6 ft)
LWL8.45 m (27.7 ft)10.40 m (34.1 ft)
Beam3.27 m (10.7 ft)3.82 m (12.5 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)
Ballast1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)73.0 m² (786 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)380 L (100.4 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.37
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
16.89
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
35.71
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
38.04
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
0.81
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.12
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
19.94

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is a modern offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 was penned by Groupe Finot. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 measures 9.68m (31.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.27m, compared to the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 at 12.08m (39.6ft) with a 3.82m beam. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is 2.40m longer than the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 displaces approximately 119% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.37 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, with an SA/D of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 35.7% for the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and 38.0% for the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 380L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 · 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40