1995 J/80 vs 1971 C&C 27 — Comparison

1995 J/80
VS
1971 C&C 271971 C&C 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 J/801971 C&C 27
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsC&C Yachts
Year19951971–1975
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSACanada
DesignerRod JohnstoneCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA8.00 m (26.2 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)6.55 m (21.5 ft)
Beam2.50 m (8.2 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.49 m (4.9 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,360 kg (2,998 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast499 kg (1,100 lbs)1,043 kg (2,299 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area32.0 m² (344 ft²)31.0 m² (334 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths25
Cabins1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 J/80
26.50
1971 C&C 27
17.13
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 J/80
36.69
1971 C&C 27
41.80
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 J/80
0.90
1971 C&C 27
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 J/80
11.55
1971 C&C 27
20.13

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 J/80 and 1971 C&C 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 J/80 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1971 C&C 27 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1995 J/80 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1971 C&C 27 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1995 J/80 measures 8.00m (26.2ft) overall with a beam of 2.50m, compared to the 1971 C&C 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1971 C&C 27 is 0.23m longer than the 1995 J/80. The 1971 C&C 27 displaces approximately 83% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 J/80 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 26.50 and 32.0 m² of sail area. The 1971 C&C 27, with an SA/D of 17.13 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1995 J/80 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 J/80 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 11.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.90). The 1971 C&C 27 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 36.7% for the 1995 J/80 and 41.8% for the 1971 C&C 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 J/80 provides 2 berths with unspecified water tankage and unspecified fuel capacity. The 1971 C&C 27 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1971 C&C 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 J/80 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1971 C&C 27 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 J/80 · 1971 C&C 27