Catalina 387 vs 1978 Sabre 30 — Comparison

Catalina 387Catalina 387
VS
1978 Sabre 301978 Sabre 30

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 3871978 Sabre 30
General
ManufacturerCatalinaSabre
Year1996–20031978–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasRoger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam3.66 m (12.0 ft)2.97 m (9.7 ft)
Draft1.96 m (6.4 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Ballast2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)1,451 kg (3,199 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area63.0 m² (678 ft²)37.0 m² (398 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths75
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 387
16.73
1978 Sabre 30
15.92
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 387
39.39
1978 Sabre 30
39.98
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 387
0.75
1978 Sabre 30
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 387
18.47
1978 Sabre 30
20.59

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 387 and 1978 Sabre 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 387 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1978 Sabre 30 is a 1970s offering from Sabre from USA. The Catalina 387 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1978 Sabre 30 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the Catalina 387 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.66m, compared to the 1978 Sabre 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 2.97m beam. The Catalina 387 is 2.44m longer than the 1978 Sabre 30. The Catalina 387 displaces approximately 106% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 387 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.73 and 63.0 m² of sail area. The 1978 Sabre 30, with an SA/D of 15.92 and 37.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 387 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 387 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1978 Sabre 30 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 39.4% for the Catalina 387 and 40.0% for the 1978 Sabre 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 387 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1978 Sabre 30 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Sabre 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 387 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 387 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 387 · 1978 Sabre 30