Catalina 387 vs 1987 Cape Dory 40 — Comparison

Catalina 387 Catalina 387
VS
1987 Cape Dory 40 1987 Cape Dory 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Catalina 387 1987 Cape Dory 40
General
Manufacturer Catalina Cape Dory
Year 1996–2003 1987–1992
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Gerry Douglas Carl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA 11.58 m (38.0 ft) 12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam 3.66 m (12.0 ft) 3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft 1.96 m (6.4 ft) 1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,484 kg (16,499 lbs) 8,618 kg (18,999 lbs)
Ballast 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 63.0 m² (678 ft²) 64.5 m² (694 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 40 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity 227 L (60.0 gal) 284 L (75.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 387
16.73
1987 Cape Dory 40
15.59
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 387
39.39
1987 Cape Dory 40
42.11
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 387
0.75
1987 Cape Dory 40
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 387
18.47
1987 Cape Dory 40
22.29

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 387 and 1987 Cape Dory 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 387 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1987 Cape Dory 40 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The Catalina 387 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the Catalina 387 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.66m, compared to the 1987 Cape Dory 40 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is 0.61m longer than the Catalina 387. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 displaces approximately 15% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 387 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.73 and 63.0 m² of sail area. The 1987 Cape Dory 40, with an SA/D of 15.59 and 64.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 387 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 387 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1987 Cape Dory 40 has a comfort ratio of 22.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 39.4% for the Catalina 387 and 42.1% for the 1987 Cape Dory 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 387 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 284L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 387 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS