2003 Sabre 402 vs 1987 Cape Dory 40 — Comparison

2003 Sabre 402 2003 Sabre 402
VS
1987 Cape Dory 40 1987 Cape Dory 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2003 Sabre 402 1987 Cape Dory 40
General
Manufacturer Sabre Cape Dory
Year 2003–2010 1987–1992
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Jim Taylor Carl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA 12.19 m (40.0 ft) 12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam 3.72 m (12.2 ft) 3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) 8,618 kg (18,999 lbs)
Ballast 3,266 kg (7,200 lbs) 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 66.0 m² (710 ft²) 64.5 m² (694 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 40 HP
Fuel Capacity 151 L (39.9 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity 227 L (60.0 gal) 284 L (75.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
1987 Cape Dory 40
15.59
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
1987 Cape Dory 40
42.11
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
1987 Cape Dory 40
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Sabre 402
18.32
1987 Cape Dory 40
22.29

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Sabre 402 and 1987 Cape Dory 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1987 Cape Dory 40 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 2003 Sabre 402 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 2003 Sabre 402 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 1987 Cape Dory 40 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Sabre 402 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of sail area. The 1987 Cape Dory 40, with an SA/D of 15.59 and 64.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Sabre 402 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Sabre 402 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1987 Cape Dory 40 has a comfort ratio of 22.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402 and 42.1% for the 1987 Cape Dory 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Sabre 402 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 284L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Sabre 402 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS