2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
VS
2003 Sabre 402 2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 2003 Sabre 402
General
Manufacturer X-Yachts Sabre
Year 2012–2018 2003–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Denmark USA
Designer Niels Jeppesen Jim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA 12.73 m (41.8 ft) 12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL 10.90 m (35.8 ft) 10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam 3.93 m (12.9 ft) 3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft 2.10 m (6.9 ft) 1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 9,800 kg (21,605 lbs) 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast 3,600 kg (7,937 lbs) 3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 79.0 m² (850 ft²) 66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 55 HP 40 HP
Fuel Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity 300 L (79.3 gal) 227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 3 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
17.52
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
36.73
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
0.74
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
18.55
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is a modern design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 measures 12.73m (41.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.93m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is 0.54m longer than the 2003 Sabre 402. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.52 and 79.0 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 36.7% for the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS