Catalina 387 vs 1990 Sabre 36 — Comparison

Catalina 387 Catalina 387
VS
1990 Sabre 36 1990 Sabre 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Catalina 387 1990 Sabre 36
General
Manufacturer Catalina Sabre
Year 1996–2003 1990–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Gerry Douglas Roger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA 11.58 m (38.0 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam 3.66 m (12.0 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.96 m (6.4 ft) 1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,484 kg (16,499 lbs) 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) 2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 63.0 m² (678 ft²) 52.5 m² (565 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 227 L (60.0 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 387
16.73
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 387
39.39
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 387
0.75
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 387
18.47
1990 Sabre 36
19.29

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 387 and 1990 Sabre 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 387 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s offering from Sabre from USA. The Catalina 387 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1990 Sabre 36 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the Catalina 387 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.66m, compared to the 1990 Sabre 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Catalina 387 is 0.61m longer than the 1990 Sabre 36. The Catalina 387 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 387 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.73 and 63.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Sabre 36, with an SA/D of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 387 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 387 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1990 Sabre 36 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 39.4% for the Catalina 387 and 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 387 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1990 Sabre 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Sabre 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 387 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 387 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS