Catalina 387 vs Hunter 450 — Comparison

Catalina 387Catalina 387
VS
Hunter 450

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 387Hunter 450
General
ManufacturerCatalinaHunter
Year1996–20032001–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)13.72 m (45.0 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)11.89 m (39.0 ft)
Beam3.66 m (12.0 ft)4.27 m (14.0 ft)
Draft1.96 m (6.4 ft)2.06 m (6.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)10,886 kg (23,999 lbs)
Ballast2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area63.0 m² (678 ft²)86.0 m² (926 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)341 L (90.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 387
16.73
Hunter 450
17.79
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 387
39.39
Hunter 450
37.50
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 387
0.75
Hunter 450
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 387
18.47
Hunter 450
15.63

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 387 and Hunter 450 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 387 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 450 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The Catalina 387 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hunter 450 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the Catalina 387 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.66m, compared to the Hunter 450 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.27m beam. The Hunter 450 is 2.14m longer than the Catalina 387. The Hunter 450 displaces approximately 45% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 387 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.73 and 63.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 450, with an SA/D of 17.79 and 86.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 450 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 387 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hunter 450 has a comfort ratio of 15.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 39.4% for the Catalina 387 and 37.5% for the Hunter 450, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 387 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hunter 450 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 341L water and 189L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 387 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 450 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 450 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 387 · Hunter 450