Hunter 36 vs 1972 Ranger 29 — Comparison
Hunter 36
1972 Ranger 29
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 36 | 1972 Ranger 29 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Ranger |
| Year | 1996–2001 | 1972–1978 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Gary Mull |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.82 m (35.5 ft) | 8.84 m (29.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.56 m (11.7 ft) | 2.84 m (9.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,313 kg (5,099 lbs) | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 56.0 m² (603 ft²) | 35.0 m² (377 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 27 HP | 13 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 95 L (25.1 gal) | 45 L (11.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 170 L (44.9 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 36 and 1972 Ranger 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 36 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1972 Ranger 29 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The Hunter 36 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1972 Ranger 29 was designed by Gary Mull.
In terms of size, the Hunter 36 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 1972 Ranger 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The Hunter 36 is 1.98m longer than the 1972 Ranger 29. The Hunter 36 displaces approximately 86% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 36 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ranger 29, with an SA/D of 16.47 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1972 Ranger 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Hunter 36 and 42.9% for the 1972 Ranger 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1972 Ranger 29 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1972 Ranger 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hunter 36 · 1972 Ranger 29