Hunter 36 vs 1990 Island Packet 29 — Comparison

Hunter 36Hunter 36
VS
1990 Island Packet 291990 Island Packet 29

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 361990 Island Packet 29
General
ManufacturerHunterIsland Packet
Year1996–20011990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonBob Johnson
Dimensions
LOA10.82 m (35.5 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.12 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area56.0 m² (603 ft²)33.5 m² (361 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine27 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)132 L (34.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 36
17.43
1990 Island Packet 29
13.84
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 36
39.22
1990 Island Packet 29
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 36
0.79
1990 Island Packet 29
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 36
17.17
1990 Island Packet 29
21.60

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 36 and 1990 Island Packet 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 36 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1990 Island Packet 29 is a 1990s offering from Island Packet from USA. The Hunter 36 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1990 Island Packet 29 was designed by Bob Johnson.

In terms of size, the Hunter 36 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 1990 Island Packet 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The Hunter 36 is 1.98m longer than the 1990 Island Packet 29. The Hunter 36 displaces approximately 53% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 36 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Island Packet 29, with an SA/D of 13.84 and 33.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hunter 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1990 Island Packet 29 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Hunter 36 and 41.2% for the 1990 Island Packet 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1990 Island Packet 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 132L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Island Packet 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 36 · 1990 Island Packet 29