Hunter 36 vs 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 — Comparison

Hunter 36Hunter 36
VS
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 362012 X-Yachts Xc 42
General
ManufacturerHunterX-Yachts
Year1996–20012012–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSADenmark
DesignerGlenn HendersonNiels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA10.82 m (35.5 ft)12.73 m (41.8 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)10.90 m (35.8 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)3.93 m (12.9 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)
Ballast2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)3,600 kg (7,937 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area56.0 m² (603 ft²)79.0 m² (850 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine27 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)300 L (79.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 36
17.43
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
17.52
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 36
39.22
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
36.73
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 36
0.79
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 36
17.17
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
18.55

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 36 and 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 36 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is a modern offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The Hunter 36 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the Hunter 36 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 at 12.73m (41.8ft) with a 3.93m beam. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is 1.91m longer than the Hunter 36. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 displaces approximately 66% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 36 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of sail area. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42, with an SA/D of 17.52 and 79.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has a comfort ratio of 18.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Hunter 36 and 36.7% for the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 300L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 36 · 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42