1996 Najad 380 vs 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 — Comparison

1996 Najad 380
VS
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 321990 Wauquiez Centurion 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1996 Najad 3801990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
General
ManufacturerNajadWauquiez
Year1996–20061990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenFrance
DesignerJudel/VrolijkJean-Marie Finot
Dimensions
LOA11.55 m (37.9 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL9.50 m (31.2 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.55 m (11.6 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.85 m (6.1 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Ballast3,050 kg (6,724 lbs)1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.0 m² (667 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)65 L (17.2 gal)
Water Capacity260 L (68.7 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1996 Najad 380
16.44
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
15.66
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1996 Najad 380
40.67
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1996 Najad 380
0.73
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1996 Najad 380
20.83
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
19.88

Detailed Comparison

The 1996 Najad 380 and 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is a 1990s offering from Wauquiez from France. The 1996 Najad 380 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 was designed by Jean-Marie Finot.

In terms of size, the 1996 Najad 380 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 1.80m longer than the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 67% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1996 Najad 380 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, with an SA/D of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1996 Najad 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1996 Najad 380 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380 and 40.0% for the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1996 Najad 380 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 65L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 Najad 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1996 Najad 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1996 Najad 380 · 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32