1996 Najad 380 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison
2010 Elan 340
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1996 Najad 380 | 2010 Elan 340 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Najad | Elan |
| Year | 1996–2006 | 2010–2014 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Sweden | Slovenia |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | Rob Humphreys |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.55 m (37.9 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.50 m (31.2 ft) | 9.00 m (29.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.55 m (11.6 ft) | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs) | 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,050 kg (6,724 lbs) | 1,750 kg (3,858 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 62.0 m² (667 ft²) | 55.0 m² (592 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 40 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 80 L (21.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 260 L (68.7 gal) | 160 L (42.3 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1996 Najad 380 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1996 Najad 380 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.
In terms of size, the 1996 Najad 380 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 1.19m longer than the 2010 Elan 340. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 29% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1996 Najad 380 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1996 Najad 380 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1996 Najad 380 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1996 Najad 380 · 2010 Elan 340