1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 vs 1984 Ericson 38 — Comparison

1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
VS
1984 Ericson 38 1984 Ericson 38

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 1984 Ericson 38
General
Manufacturer Hallberg-Rassy Ericson
Year 1997–2007 1984–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden USA
Designer German Frers Bruce King / Ron Holland
Dimensions
LOA 10.35 m (34.0 ft) 11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL 8.85 m (29.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam 3.34 m (11.0 ft) 3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft 1.70 m (5.6 ft) 1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) 7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs) 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 53.0 m² (571 ft²) 60.0 m² (646 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 30 HP
Fuel Capacity 120 L (31.7 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 200 L (52.8 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
16.68
1984 Ericson 38
15.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
41.38
1984 Ericson 38
42.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
0.74
1984 Ericson 38
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
20.67
1984 Ericson 38
20.06

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 and 1984 Ericson 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is a 1990s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1984 Ericson 38 is a 1980s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 was penned by German Frers. The 1984 Ericson 38 was designed by Bruce King / Ron Holland.

In terms of size, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 measures 10.35m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.34m, compared to the 1984 Ericson 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1984 Ericson 38 is 1.23m longer than the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34. The 1984 Ericson 38 displaces approximately 29% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.68 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Ericson 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1984 Ericson 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.4% for the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 and 42.4% for the 1984 Ericson 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1984 Ericson 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 Ericson 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS