1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison

1997 Hallberg-Rassy 341997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
VS
1984 Pearson 341984 Pearson 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Hallberg-Rassy 341984 Pearson 34
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyPearson
Year1997–20071984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA10.35 m (34.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL8.85 m (29.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.34 m (11.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.70 m (5.6 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area53.0 m² (571 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
16.68
1984 Pearson 34
15.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
41.38
1984 Pearson 34
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
0.74
1984 Pearson 34
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
20.67
1984 Pearson 34
20.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is a 1990s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 was penned by German Frers. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 measures 10.35m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.34m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1984 Pearson 34 is 0.01m longer than the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 displaces approximately 7% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.68 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.4% for the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 · 1984 Pearson 34