1997 Nautor Swan 40 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

1997 Nautor Swan 40 1997 Nautor Swan 40
VS
1995 Feeling 39 1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1997 Nautor Swan 40 1995 Feeling 39
General
Manufacturer Nautor Swan Feeling
Year 1997–2002 1995–2003
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Finland France
Designer German Frers Philippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA 12.30 m (40.4 ft) 11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam 3.85 m (12.6 ft) 3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft 2.20 m (7.2 ft) 1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,500 kg (18,739 lbs) 7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast 3,600 kg (7,937 lbs) 3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 73.5 m² (791 ft²) 66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 35 HP
Fuel Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity 250 L (66.0 gal) 250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
17.93
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
42.35
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
0.76
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
18.11
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is a 1990s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 was penned by German Frers. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 measures 12.30m (40.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.85m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is 0.50m longer than the 1995 Feeling 39. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 displaces approximately 9% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.93 and 73.5 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 42.4% for the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1995 Feeling 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS