Bavaria 34 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

Bavaria 34Bavaria 34
VS
1973 Ranger 331973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationBavaria 341973 Ranger 33
General
ManufacturerBavariaRanger
Year1998–20041973–1979
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerJ&J DesignGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA10.35 m (34.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL9.10 m (29.9 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.38 m (11.1 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Bavaria 34
17.60
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Bavaria 34
32.69
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Bavaria 34
0.78
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Bavaria 34
17.57
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The Bavaria 34 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Bavaria 34 is a 1990s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The Bavaria 34 was penned by J&J Design. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the Bavaria 34 measures 10.35m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.38m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The Bavaria 34 is 0.29m longer than the 1973 Ranger 33. The Bavaria 34 displaces approximately 9% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Bavaria 34 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.60 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Bavaria 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Bavaria 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 32.7% for the Bavaria 34 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Bavaria 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1973 Ranger 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Bavaria 34 · 1973 Ranger 33