Bavaria 34 vs Catalina 270 — Comparison

Bavaria 34 Bavaria 34
VS
Catalina 270 Catalina 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Bavaria 34 Catalina 270
General
Manufacturer Bavaria Catalina
Year 1998–2004 1992–2002
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany USA
Designer J&J Design Gerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA 10.35 m (34.0 ft) 8.31 m (27.3 ft)
LWL 9.10 m (29.9 ft) 7.24 m (23.8 ft)
Beam 3.38 m (11.1 ft) 2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft 1.80 m (5.9 ft) 1.47 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,200 kg (11,464 lbs) 2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Ballast 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) 907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 52.0 m² (560 ft²) 31.0 m² (334 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 12 HP
Fuel Capacity 80 L (21.1 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 170 L (44.9 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Bavaria 34
17.60
Catalina 270
18.01
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Bavaria 34
32.69
Catalina 270
39.21
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Bavaria 34
0.78
Catalina 270
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Bavaria 34
17.57
Catalina 270
16.24

Detailed Comparison

The Bavaria 34 and Catalina 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Bavaria 34 is a 1990s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the Catalina 270 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The Bavaria 34 was penned by J&J Design. The Catalina 270 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the Bavaria 34 measures 10.35m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.38m, compared to the Catalina 270 at 8.31m (27.3ft) with a 2.74m beam. The Bavaria 34 is 2.04m longer than the Catalina 270. The Bavaria 34 displaces approximately 125% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Bavaria 34 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.60 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The Catalina 270, with an SA/D of 18.01 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 270 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Bavaria 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Catalina 270 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 32.7% for the Bavaria 34 and 39.2% for the Catalina 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Bavaria 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The Catalina 270 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Bavaria 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 270 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Bavaria 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS