Bavaria 34 vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison

Bavaria 34Bavaria 34
VS
1996 Najad 380

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationBavaria 341996 Najad 380
General
ManufacturerBavariaNajad
Year1998–20041996–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanySweden
DesignerJ&J DesignJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA10.35 m (34.0 ft)11.55 m (37.9 ft)
LWL9.10 m (29.9 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
Beam3.38 m (11.1 ft)3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Ballast1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)3,050 kg (6,724 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)260 L (68.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Bavaria 34
17.60
1996 Najad 380
16.44
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Bavaria 34
32.69
1996 Najad 380
40.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Bavaria 34
0.78
1996 Najad 380
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Bavaria 34
17.57
1996 Najad 380
20.83

Detailed Comparison

The Bavaria 34 and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Bavaria 34 is a 1990s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The Bavaria 34 was penned by J&J Design. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the Bavaria 34 measures 10.35m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.38m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 1.20m longer than the Bavaria 34. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 44% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Bavaria 34 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.60 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Bavaria 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Bavaria 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 32.7% for the Bavaria 34 and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Bavaria 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Bavaria 34 · 1996 Najad 380