1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 vs Hunter 260 — Comparison

1998 Beneteau Oceanis 3311998 Beneteau Oceanis 331
VS
Hunter 260Hunter 260

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331Hunter 260
General
ManufacturerBeneteauHunter
Year1998–20041998–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerGroupe FinotGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA10.14 m (33.3 ft)7.85 m (25.8 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)6.86 m (22.5 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Ballast1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)771 kg (1,700 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.0 m² (538 ft²)27.5 m² (296 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331
17.40
Hunter 260
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331
34.07
Hunter 260
37.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331
0.80
Hunter 260
0.87
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331
17.63
Hunter 260
15.99

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 and Hunter 260 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the Hunter 260 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 was penned by Groupe Finot. The Hunter 260 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 measures 10.14m (33.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the Hunter 260 at 7.85m (25.8ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 is 2.29m longer than the Hunter 260. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 displaces approximately 144% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.40 and 50.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 260, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 27.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hunter 260 has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.87. The ballast ratios are 34.1% for the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 and 37.8% for the Hunter 260, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hunter 260 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 · Hunter 260