1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

1998 Beneteau Oceanis 3311998 Beneteau Oceanis 331
VS
2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Beneteau Oceanis 3312003 Sabre 402
General
ManufacturerBeneteauSabre
Year1998–20042003–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerGroupe FinotJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA10.14 m (33.3 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.0 m² (538 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331
17.40
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331
34.07
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331
0.80
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331
17.63
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 was penned by Groupe Finot. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 measures 10.14m (33.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 2.05m longer than the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331. The 2003 Sabre 402 displaces approximately 64% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.40 and 50.0 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 34.1% for the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2003 Sabre 402 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Sabre 402 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 · 2003 Sabre 402