Catalina 28 vs Hunter 356 — Comparison

Catalina 28Catalina 28
VS
Hunter 356Hunter 356

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 28Hunter 356
General
ManufacturerCatalinaHunter
Year1998–20042000–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA8.69 m (28.5 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)3.53 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,812 kg (6,199 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area33.5 m² (361 ft²)53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 28
17.09
Hunter 356
17.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 28
40.33
Hunter 356
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 28
0.82
Hunter 356
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 28
16.59
Hunter 356
16.38

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 28 and Hunter 356 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 28 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 356 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The Catalina 28 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hunter 356 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the Catalina 28 measures 8.69m (28.5ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the Hunter 356 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.53m beam. The Hunter 356 is 2.13m longer than the Catalina 28. The Hunter 356 displaces approximately 94% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.09 and 33.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 356, with an SA/D of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 356 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The Hunter 356 has a comfort ratio of 16.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 40.3% for the Catalina 28 and 40.0% for the Hunter 356, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 28 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 95L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 356 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 356 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 28 · Hunter 356