1998 Catalina 42 vs 1981 Nautor Swan 36 — Comparison

1998 Catalina 421998 Catalina 42
VS
1981 Nautor Swan 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Catalina 421981 Nautor Swan 36
General
ManufacturerCatalinaNautor Swan
Year1998–20041981–1989
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFinland
DesignerGerry DouglasSparkman & Stephens
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL10.82 m (35.5 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.5 m² (780 ft²)54.5 m² (587 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Catalina 42
16.39
1981 Nautor Swan 36
16.15
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Catalina 42
40.48
1981 Nautor Swan 36
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Catalina 42
0.75
1981 Nautor Swan 36
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Catalina 42
17.96
1981 Nautor Swan 36
22.73

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Catalina 42 and 1981 Nautor Swan 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Catalina 42 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is a 1980s offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The 1998 Catalina 42 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 was designed by Sparkman & Stephens.

In terms of size, the 1998 Catalina 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1998 Catalina 42 is 1.83m longer than the 1981 Nautor Swan 36. The 1998 Catalina 42 displaces approximately 50% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Catalina 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.39 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36, with an SA/D of 16.15 and 54.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 Catalina 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Catalina 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has a comfort ratio of 22.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1998 Catalina 42 and 42.9% for the 1981 Nautor Swan 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Catalina 42 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Catalina 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Catalina 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Catalina 42 · 1981 Nautor Swan 36