1998 Catalina 42 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

1998 Catalina 421998 Catalina 42
VS
2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Catalina 422003 Sabre 402
General
ManufacturerCatalinaSabre
Year1998–20042003–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL10.82 m (35.5 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.5 m² (780 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Catalina 42
16.39
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Catalina 42
40.48
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Catalina 42
0.75
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Catalina 42
17.96
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Catalina 42 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Catalina 42 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1998 Catalina 42 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1998 Catalina 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 1998 Catalina 42 is 0.61m longer than the 2003 Sabre 402. The 1998 Catalina 42 displaces approximately 17% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Catalina 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.39 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Sabre 402 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Catalina 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1998 Catalina 42 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Catalina 42 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2003 Sabre 402 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Sabre 402 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Catalina 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Catalina 42 · 2003 Sabre 402