1998 Hunter 340 vs Catalina 28 — Comparison
1998 Hunter 340
Catalina 28
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1998 Hunter 340 | Catalina 28 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Catalina |
| Year | 1998–2003 | 1998–2004 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Gerry Douglas |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) | 8.69 m (28.5 ft) |
| LWL | 9.02 m (29.6 ft) | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.51 m (11.5 ft) | 2.90 m (9.5 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) | 2,812 kg (6,199 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) | 1,134 kg (2,500 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 51.1 m² (550 ft²) | 33.5 m² (361 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 22 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 95 L (25.1 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 152 L (40.2 gal) | 95 L (25.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1998 Hunter 340 and Catalina 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Hunter 340 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the Catalina 28 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1998 Hunter 340 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Catalina 28 was designed by Gerry Douglas.
In terms of size, the 1998 Hunter 340 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the Catalina 28 at 8.69m (28.5ft) with a 2.90m beam. The 1998 Hunter 340 is 1.67m longer than the Catalina 28. The 1998 Hunter 340 displaces approximately 94% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1998 Hunter 340 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.78 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The Catalina 28, with an SA/D of 17.09 and 33.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1998 Hunter 340 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Catalina 28 has a comfort ratio of 16.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 1998 Hunter 340 and 40.3% for the Catalina 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1998 Hunter 340 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The Catalina 28 offers 6 berths in 1 cabin with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1998 Hunter 340 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Catalina 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1998 Hunter 340 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1998 Hunter 340 · Catalina 28