1998 Hunter 340 vs 2005 X-Yachts X-35 — Comparison

1998 Hunter 3401998 Hunter 340
VS
2005 X-Yachts X-352005 X-Yachts X-35

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Hunter 3402005 X-Yachts X-35
General
ManufacturerHunterX-Yachts
Year1998–20032005–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSADenmark
DesignerGlenn HendersonNiels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)10.59 m (34.7 ft)
LWL9.02 m (29.6 ft)9.40 m (30.8 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.30 m (10.8 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)5,500 kg (12,125 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)2,000 kg (4,409 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.1 m² (550 ft²)56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)65 L (17.2 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)130 L (34.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Hunter 340
16.78
2005 X-Yachts X-35
18.26
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Hunter 340
37.50
2005 X-Yachts X-35
36.36
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Hunter 340
0.80
2005 X-Yachts X-35
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Hunter 340
17.69
2005 X-Yachts X-35
18.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Hunter 340 and 2005 X-Yachts X-35 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Hunter 340 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2005 X-Yachts X-35 is a 2000s offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The 1998 Hunter 340 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2005 X-Yachts X-35 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the 1998 Hunter 340 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 2005 X-Yachts X-35 at 10.59m (34.7ft) with a 3.30m beam. The 2005 X-Yachts X-35 is 0.23m longer than the 1998 Hunter 340. The 2005 X-Yachts X-35 displaces approximately 1% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Hunter 340 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.78 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The 2005 X-Yachts X-35, with an SA/D of 18.26 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2005 X-Yachts X-35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Hunter 340 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2005 X-Yachts X-35 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 1998 Hunter 340 and 36.4% for the 2005 X-Yachts X-35, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Hunter 340 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 2005 X-Yachts X-35 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 130L water and 65L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2005 X-Yachts X-35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2005 X-Yachts X-35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Hunter 340 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Hunter 340 · 2005 X-Yachts X-35