1999 Catalina 400 vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison

1999 Catalina 4001999 Catalina 400
VS
1984 Pearson 341984 Pearson 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1999 Catalina 4001984 Pearson 34
General
ManufacturerCatalinaPearson
Year1999–20061984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA12.12 m (39.8 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,845 kg (19,500 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area66.9 m² (720 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1999 Catalina 400
15.89
1984 Pearson 34
15.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1999 Catalina 400
41.03
1984 Pearson 34
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1999 Catalina 400
0.75
1984 Pearson 34
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1999 Catalina 400
18.97
1984 Pearson 34
20.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1999 Catalina 400 and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1999 Catalina 400 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1999 Catalina 400 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1999 Catalina 400 measures 12.12m (39.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1999 Catalina 400 is 1.76m longer than the 1984 Pearson 34. The 1999 Catalina 400 displaces approximately 63% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1999 Catalina 400 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.89 and 66.9 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1999 Catalina 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1999 Catalina 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.0% for the 1999 Catalina 400 and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1999 Catalina 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Pearson 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1999 Catalina 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1999 Catalina 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1999 Catalina 400 · 1984 Pearson 34