1999 Catalina 400 vs Hanse 400 — Comparison

1999 Catalina 400 1999 Catalina 400
VS
Hanse 400 Hanse 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1999 Catalina 400 Hanse 400
General
Manufacturer Catalina Hanse
Year 1999–2006 2002–2006
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Germany
Designer Gerry Douglas judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 12.12 m (39.8 ft) 12.10 m (39.7 ft)
LWL 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 10.60 m (34.8 ft)
Beam 3.86 m (12.7 ft) 3.80 m (12.5 ft)
Draft 1.98 m (6.5 ft) 1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,845 kg (19,500 lbs) 7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)
Ballast 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs) 2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 66.9 m² (720 ft²) 68.0 m² (732 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 29 HP
Fuel Capacity 151 L (39.9 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity 303 L (80.0 gal) 280 L (74.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 8
Cabins 3 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1999 Catalina 400
15.89
Hanse 400
17.87
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1999 Catalina 400
41.03
Hanse 400
30.92
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1999 Catalina 400
0.75
Hanse 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1999 Catalina 400
18.97
Hanse 400
16.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1999 Catalina 400 and Hanse 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1999 Catalina 400 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hanse 400 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1999 Catalina 400 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hanse 400 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1999 Catalina 400 measures 12.12m (39.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the Hanse 400 at 12.10m (39.7ft) with a 3.80m beam. The 1999 Catalina 400 is 0.02m longer than the Hanse 400. The 1999 Catalina 400 displaces approximately 16% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1999 Catalina 400 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.89 and 66.9 m² of sail area. The Hanse 400, with an SA/D of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1999 Catalina 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hanse 400 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.0% for the 1999 Catalina 400 and 30.9% for the Hanse 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1999 Catalina 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The Hanse 400 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1999 Catalina 400 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS