2000 Catalina 470 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

2000 Catalina 470
VS
2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Catalina 4702000 Sabre 386
General
ManufacturerCatalinaSabre
Year2000–20082000–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA14.33 m (47.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL12.19 m (40.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam4.24 m (13.9 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement13,154 kg (29,000 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area89.6 m² (964 ft²)60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity454 L (119.9 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Catalina 470
16.33
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Catalina 470
41.38
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Catalina 470
0.72
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Catalina 470
17.92
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Catalina 470 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Catalina 470 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 2000 Catalina 470 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 2000 Catalina 470 measures 14.33m (47.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.24m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2000 Catalina 470 is 2.75m longer than the 2000 Sabre 386. The 2000 Catalina 470 displaces approximately 81% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Catalina 470 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.33 and 89.6 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Sabre 386 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Catalina 470 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.4% for the 2000 Catalina 470 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Catalina 470 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 454L of water capacity and 227L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Sabre 386 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Catalina 470 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Catalina 470 · 2000 Sabre 386