2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 vs 1975 Pearson 28 — Comparison

2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
VS
1975 Pearson 281975 Pearson 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Hallberg-Rassy 311975 Pearson 28
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyPearson
Year2000–20101975–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA9.47 m (31.1 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL8.25 m (27.1 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam3.18 m (10.4 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Ballast1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)1,270 kg (2,800 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)30.0 m² (323 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
16.35
1975 Pearson 28
14.83
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
40.22
1975 Pearson 28
43.08
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
0.77
1975 Pearson 28
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
20.39
1975 Pearson 28
21.23

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 1975 Pearson 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1975 Pearson 28 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was penned by German Frers. The 1975 Pearson 28 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 measures 9.47m (31.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.18m, compared to the 1975 Pearson 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is 0.94m longer than the 1975 Pearson 28. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 1975 Pearson 28, with an SA/D of 14.83 and 30.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1975 Pearson 28 has a comfort ratio of 21.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 43.1% for the 1975 Pearson 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1975 Pearson 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 · 1975 Pearson 28