2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 vs 1981 Nautor Swan 36 — Comparison

2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
VS
1981 Nautor Swan 36 1981 Nautor Swan 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 1981 Nautor Swan 36
General
Manufacturer Hallberg-Rassy Nautor Swan
Year 2000–2010 1981–1989
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden Finland
Designer German Frers Sparkman & Stephens
Dimensions
LOA 9.47 m (31.1 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 8.25 m (27.1 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam 3.18 m (10.4 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.60 m (5.2 ft) 1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) 6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast 1,850 kg (4,079 lbs) 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 44.5 m² (479 ft²) 54.5 m² (587 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 21 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 80 L (21.1 gal) 100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity 140 L (37.0 gal) 180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
16.35
1981 Nautor Swan 36
16.15
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
40.22
1981 Nautor Swan 36
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
0.77
1981 Nautor Swan 36
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
20.39
1981 Nautor Swan 36
22.73

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 1981 Nautor Swan 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is a 1980s offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was penned by German Frers. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 was designed by Sparkman & Stephens.

In terms of size, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 measures 9.47m (31.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.18m, compared to the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is 1.50m longer than the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36, with an SA/D of 16.15 and 54.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has a comfort ratio of 22.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 42.9% for the 1981 Nautor Swan 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS