2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison

2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
VS
1990 Feeling 321990 Feeling 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Hallberg-Rassy 311990 Feeling 32
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyFeeling
Year2000–20101990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenFrance
DesignerGerman FrersPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA9.47 m (31.1 ft)9.85 m (32.3 ft)
LWL8.25 m (27.1 ft)8.20 m (26.9 ft)
Beam3.18 m (10.4 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)
Ballast1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
16.35
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
40.22
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
0.77
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
20.39
1990 Feeling 32
20.72

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was penned by German Frers. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 measures 9.47m (31.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.18m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Feeling 32 is 0.38m longer than the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31. The 1990 Feeling 32 displaces approximately 2% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 · 1990 Feeling 32