2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 vs 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 — Comparison

2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
VS
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 321990 Wauquiez Centurion 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Hallberg-Rassy 311990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyWauquiez
Year2000–20101990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenFrance
DesignerGerman FrersJean-Marie Finot
Dimensions
LOA9.47 m (31.1 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL8.25 m (27.1 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.18 m (10.4 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Ballast1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)65 L (17.2 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
16.35
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
15.66
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
40.22
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
0.77
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
20.39
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
19.88

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is a 1990s offering from Wauquiez from France. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was penned by German Frers. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 was designed by Jean-Marie Finot.

In terms of size, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 measures 9.47m (31.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.18m, compared to the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is 0.28m longer than the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 displaces approximately 2% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, with an SA/D of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 40.0% for the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 65L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 · 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32