Hunter 31 vs 1983 Tartan 37 — Comparison

Hunter 31Hunter 31
VS
1983 Tartan 371983 Tartan 37

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 311983 Tartan 37
General
ManufacturerHunterTartan
Year2000–20051983–1989
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonSparkman & Stephens
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.12 m (10.2 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)7,258 kg (16,001 lbs)
Ballast1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)3,084 kg (6,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.0 m² (474 ft²)57.0 m² (614 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 31
17.51
1983 Tartan 37
15.45
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 31
38.90
1983 Tartan 37
42.49
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 31
0.78
1983 Tartan 37
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 31
18.65
1983 Tartan 37
21.48

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 31 and 1983 Tartan 37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 31 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1983 Tartan 37 is a 1980s offering from Tartan from USA. The Hunter 31 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1983 Tartan 37 was designed by Sparkman & Stephens.

In terms of size, the Hunter 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.12m, compared to the 1983 Tartan 37 at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 1983 Tartan 37 is 1.83m longer than the Hunter 31. The 1983 Tartan 37 displaces approximately 78% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 31 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.51 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Tartan 37, with an SA/D of 15.45 and 57.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 31 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1983 Tartan 37 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the Hunter 31 and 42.5% for the 1983 Tartan 37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 31 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1983 Tartan 37 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Tartan 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Tartan 37 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 31 · 1983 Tartan 37