Hunter 356 vs 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 — Comparison
Hunter 356
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 356 | 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Hallberg-Rassy |
| Year | 2000–2005 | 1994–2003 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Sweden |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Olle Enderlein |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.82 m (35.5 ft) | 8.85 m (29.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.30 m (30.5 ft) | 7.70 m (25.3 ft) |
| Beam | 3.53 m (11.6 ft) | 3.02 m (9.9 ft) |
| Draft | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) | 1.50 m (4.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) | 3,700 kg (8,157 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) | 1,500 kg (3,307 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 53.0 m² (571 ft²) | 38.0 m² (409 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 60 L (15.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 100 L (26.4 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 356 and 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 356 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is a 1990s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The Hunter 356 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 was designed by Olle Enderlein.
In terms of size, the Hunter 356 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.53m, compared to the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 at 8.85m (29.0ft) with a 3.02m beam. The Hunter 356 is 1.97m longer than the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29. The Hunter 356 displaces approximately 47% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 356 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29, with an SA/D of 16.14 and 38.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 356 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 356 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the Hunter 356 and 40.5% for the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 356 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L water and 60L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 356 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hunter 356 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hunter 356 · 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29