Hunter 356 vs 2002 X-Yachts X-37 — Comparison

Hunter 356Hunter 356
VS
2002 X-Yachts X-37

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 3562002 X-Yachts X-37
General
ManufacturerHunterX-Yachts
Year2000–20052002–2008
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSADenmark
DesignerGlenn HendersonNiels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA10.82 m (35.5 ft)11.15 m (36.6 ft)
LWL9.30 m (30.5 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam3.53 m (11.6 ft)3.42 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)2.15 m (7.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)6,500 kg (14,330 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area53.0 m² (571 ft²)62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 356
17.40
2002 X-Yachts X-37
18.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 356
40.00
2002 X-Yachts X-37
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 356
0.80
2002 X-Yachts X-37
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 356
16.38
2002 X-Yachts X-37
18.77

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 356 and 2002 X-Yachts X-37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 356 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is a 2000s offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The Hunter 356 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the Hunter 356 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.53m, compared to the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 at 11.15m (36.6ft) with a 3.42m beam. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is 0.33m longer than the Hunter 356. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 displaces approximately 19% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 356 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37, with an SA/D of 18.09 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 356 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has a comfort ratio of 18.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the Hunter 356 and 38.5% for the 2002 X-Yachts X-37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 356 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 356 · 2002 X-Yachts X-37