Bavaria 40 vs Catalina 387 — Comparison

Bavaria 40Bavaria 40
VS
Catalina 387Catalina 387

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationBavaria 40Catalina 387
General
ManufacturerBavariaCatalina
Year2001–20061996–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerJ&J DesignGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA12.35 m (40.5 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL10.75 m (35.3 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.99 m (13.1 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.96 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.0 m² (775 ft²)63.0 m² (678 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity160 L (42.3 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Bavaria 40
17.56
Catalina 387
16.73
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Bavaria 40
30.59
Catalina 387
39.39
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Bavaria 40
0.78
Catalina 387
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Bavaria 40
16.39
Catalina 387
18.47

Detailed Comparison

The Bavaria 40 and Catalina 387 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Bavaria 40 is a 2000s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the Catalina 387 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The Bavaria 40 was penned by J&J Design. The Catalina 387 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the Bavaria 40 measures 12.35m (40.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.99m, compared to the Catalina 387 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The Bavaria 40 is 0.77m longer than the Catalina 387. The Bavaria 40 displaces approximately 14% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Bavaria 40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.56 and 72.0 m² of sail area. The Catalina 387, with an SA/D of 16.73 and 63.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Bavaria 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Bavaria 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Catalina 387 has a comfort ratio of 18.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 30.6% for the Bavaria 40 and 39.4% for the Catalina 387, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Bavaria 40 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 160L of fuel. The Catalina 387 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 387 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Bavaria 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Bavaria 40 · Catalina 387