Hunter 380 vs 1987 C&C 44 — Comparison

Hunter 380Hunter 380
VS
1987 C&C 44

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 3801987 C&C 44
General
ManufacturerHunterC&C Yachts
Year2001–20051987–1993
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSACanada
DesignerGlenn HendersonCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)13.41 m (44.0 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
Beam3.76 m (12.3 ft)3.96 m (13.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)10,433 kg (23,001 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area64.0 m² (689 ft²)80.0 m² (861 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP45 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)300 L (79.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 380
17.35
1987 C&C 44
17.02
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 380
37.51
1987 C&C 44
41.30
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 380
0.78
1987 C&C 44
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 380
17.27
1987 C&C 44
18.72

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 380 and 1987 C&C 44 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 380 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1987 C&C 44 is a 1980s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The Hunter 380 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1987 C&C 44 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the Hunter 380 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1987 C&C 44 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 3.96m beam. The 1987 C&C 44 is 1.83m longer than the Hunter 380. The 1987 C&C 44 displaces approximately 44% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 380 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of sail area. The 1987 C&C 44, with an SA/D of 17.02 and 80.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 380 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1987 C&C 44 has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the Hunter 380 and 41.3% for the 1987 C&C 44, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 380 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1987 C&C 44 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 300L water and 170L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1987 C&C 44 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 380 · 1987 C&C 44