Hanse 400 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

Hanse 400
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 4001976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerHanseC&C Yachts
Year2002–20061976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyCanada
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA12.10 m (39.7 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.60 m (34.8 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.80 m (12.5 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area68.0 m² (732 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity280 L (74.0 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 400
17.87
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 400
30.92
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 400
0.77
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 400
16.16
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 400 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 400 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The Hanse 400 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the Hanse 400 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Hanse 400 is 2.04m longer than the 1976 C&C 33. The Hanse 400 displaces approximately 68% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 400 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 400 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1976 C&C 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 400 · 1976 C&C 33