Hanse 400 vs 1977 Cal 33 — Comparison

Hanse 400
VS
1977 Cal 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 4001977 Cal 33
General
ManufacturerHanseCal
Year2002–20061977–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coBill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA12.10 m (39.7 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.60 m (34.8 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.80 m (12.5 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)
Ballast2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area68.0 m² (732 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity280 L (74.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 400
17.87
1977 Cal 33
14.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 400
30.92
1977 Cal 33
41.74
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 400
0.77
1977 Cal 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 400
16.16
1977 Cal 33
22.63

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 400 and 1977 Cal 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 400 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1977 Cal 33 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The Hanse 400 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1977 Cal 33 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the Hanse 400 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the 1977 Cal 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The Hanse 400 is 2.04m longer than the 1977 Cal 33. The Hanse 400 displaces approximately 46% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 400 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of sail area. The 1977 Cal 33, with an SA/D of 14.53 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1977 Cal 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 400 and 41.7% for the 1977 Cal 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1977 Cal 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1977 Cal 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 400 · 1977 Cal 33