Hanse 400 vs Hunter 30 — Comparison

Hanse 400
VS
Hunter 30Hunter 30

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 400Hunter 30
General
ManufacturerHanseHunter
Year2002–20061991–1996
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA12.10 m (39.7 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL10.60 m (34.8 ft)7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam3.80 m (12.5 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area68.0 m² (732 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity280 L (74.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 400
17.87
Hunter 30
16.94
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 400
30.92
Hunter 30
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 400
0.77
Hunter 30
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 400
16.16
Hunter 30
19.54

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 400 and Hunter 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 400 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hunter 30 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The Hanse 400 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The Hunter 30 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the Hanse 400 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the Hunter 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The Hanse 400 is 2.96m longer than the Hunter 30. The Hanse 400 displaces approximately 97% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 400 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 30, with an SA/D of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hunter 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 400 and 41.2% for the Hunter 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The Hunter 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 400 · Hunter 30