2002 X-Yachts X-37 vs 1975 Pearson 28 — Comparison

2002 X-Yachts X-37
VS
1975 Pearson 281975 Pearson 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2002 X-Yachts X-371975 Pearson 28
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsPearson
Year2002–20081975–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkUSA
DesignerNiels JeppesenWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA11.15 m (36.6 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL9.75 m (32.0 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam3.42 m (11.2 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft2.15 m (7.1 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,500 kg (14,330 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Ballast2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)1,270 kg (2,800 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.0 m² (667 ft²)30.0 m² (323 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2002 X-Yachts X-37
18.09
1975 Pearson 28
14.83
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2002 X-Yachts X-37
38.46
1975 Pearson 28
43.08
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2002 X-Yachts X-37
0.73
1975 Pearson 28
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2002 X-Yachts X-37
18.77
1975 Pearson 28
21.23

Detailed Comparison

The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 and 1975 Pearson 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is a 2000s design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 1975 Pearson 28 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 1975 Pearson 28 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 measures 11.15m (36.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.42m, compared to the 1975 Pearson 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is 2.62m longer than the 1975 Pearson 28. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 displaces approximately 120% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.09 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 1975 Pearson 28, with an SA/D of 14.83 and 30.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1975 Pearson 28 has a comfort ratio of 21.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 and 43.1% for the 1975 Pearson 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1975 Pearson 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2002 X-Yachts X-37 · 1975 Pearson 28