2003 Hunter 41 AC vs Hanse 400 — Comparison

2003 Hunter 41 AC
VS
Hanse 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2003 Hunter 41 ACHanse 400
General
ManufacturerHunterHanse
Year2003–20072002–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerGlenn Hendersonjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA12.50 m (41.0 ft)12.10 m (39.7 ft)
LWL10.82 m (35.5 ft)10.60 m (34.8 ft)
Beam4.09 m (13.4 ft)3.80 m (12.5 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,072 kg (20,000 lbs)7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area73.2 m² (788 ft²)68.0 m² (732 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeShoal draftFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP29 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)280 L (74.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
17.10
Hanse 400
17.87
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
35.00
Hanse 400
30.92
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
0.79
Hanse 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
16.65
Hanse 400
16.16

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Hunter 41 AC and Hanse 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the Hanse 400 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Hanse 400 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.09m, compared to the Hanse 400 at 12.10m (39.7ft) with a 3.80m beam. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is 0.40m longer than the Hanse 400. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC displaces approximately 19% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.10 and 73.2 m² of sail area. The Hanse 400, with an SA/D of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hanse 400 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 30.9% for the Hanse 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The Hanse 400 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2003 Hunter 41 AC · Hanse 400