2004 Hunter 466 vs Hanse 400 — Comparison

2004 Hunter 4662004 Hunter 466
VS
Hanse 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2004 Hunter 466Hanse 400
General
ManufacturerHunterHanse
Year2004–20082002–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerGlenn Hendersonjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA14.17 m (46.5 ft)12.10 m (39.7 ft)
LWL12.50 m (41.0 ft)10.60 m (34.8 ft)
Beam4.37 m (14.3 ft)3.80 m (12.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement12,247 kg (27,000 lbs)7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)
Ballast4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area90.5 m² (974 ft²)68.0 m² (732 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP29 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity379 L (100.1 gal)280 L (74.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2004 Hunter 466
17.30
Hanse 400
17.87
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2004 Hunter 466
33.33
Hanse 400
30.92
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2004 Hunter 466
0.76
Hanse 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2004 Hunter 466
15.61
Hanse 400
16.16

Detailed Comparison

The 2004 Hunter 466 and Hanse 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2004 Hunter 466 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the Hanse 400 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 2004 Hunter 466 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Hanse 400 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 2004 Hunter 466 measures 14.17m (46.5ft) overall with a beam of 4.37m, compared to the Hanse 400 at 12.10m (39.7ft) with a 3.80m beam. The 2004 Hunter 466 is 2.07m longer than the Hanse 400. The 2004 Hunter 466 displaces approximately 61% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2004 Hunter 466 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.30 and 90.5 m² of sail area. The Hanse 400, with an SA/D of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2004 Hunter 466 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hanse 400 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 33.3% for the 2004 Hunter 466 and 30.9% for the Hanse 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2004 Hunter 466 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 379L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The Hanse 400 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 400 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2004 Hunter 466 · Hanse 400